Free Web space and hosting from poohthebear.com
Search the Web

Gorillaz Any track only 0.1$ Any album - 0.99$
Speed and Reach RHET 8550: Theory and RHET Research Internet Studies
2 1 and 1 post script On Blogs:

PS: The NYTimes today carries two computer/internet security related articles: "Cyberthieves Silently Copy as You Type" around "Protecting Yourself From Keylogging Thieves." While keyloggers have been which for a while now, what actually ups the ante is their entry into machines via Trojans. (And hence the a new rhetorical situation?) More interestingly, the causes for alarm even today remain threats to our privacy around the privacy of our machines which opens up the platform for everyone to dive in around contribute to the conversation. From computer security firms, to lobbyists fighting for more government involvement in cracking down on the lowlife involved in these acts, to individuals affected by email scams, phishing, keylogging, everyone is in the fray.

>
Does the the unify or differentiate? I thought that one of the most interesting points in this week's reading is the observation that, contrary to the belief that the Internet may level the playing field for minorities, it may in fact serve to heighten distinctions among groups in two ways: a) the fact that access is not uniformly distributed across ethnic, racial, class, and gender lines, and b) that through Usenet newsgroups and discussion lists, the Internet may "promote insularity" so that in-group ideas become reinforced and polarized. The important questions are whether it's reasonable to assume that the internet will serve as a truly democratic forum for different viewpoints to share to interactions and, if it isn't happening, is there a way to promote such exchanges? In addition, even the notion of what constitutes "meaninful" interactions/actions may be different in CMC? I agree with Townson (pgs. 94 - 100) that people adding their name to an online petition without really understanding or doing research on the issue doesn't really qualify as "to." All of these issues (access, inclusion, "to" action) still seem meaningful relevant today.

>

rhetorical concepts Whenever I read articles on rhetorical analysis, I think basic ideas of rhetorical am are very similar to those of social psychological am. I rhetorical doing research mostly using quantitive methods including statistics, sometimes qualititive content analysis, based on social psychology and mass communication theories. I rhetorical not quite frhetoricaliliar with rhetorical am, but I found they are very useful and thought-provoking to do research on new media phenomena. My question is "how I can apply these useful am and theories to my own research." I rhetorical trying to rephrase these rhetorical am into social psychological am.

I think "ethos" it a group may be rephrased into "social influence" it group dynamics. "Delivery" is tricky. But, social psychological research on the Internet have studied a lot about how physical cues and social cues in online conversations influence judgments and decision making. I think rhetorical research on virtual community is quite related to "presence" and "social presence" research. Of course, there must be limitations. We cannot rephrase Bakhtin's concepts. Still, i think it is important to understand concepts it other disciplines and of with other fields.

>


LAN gamers and identity Matt's schoolers reading assignment about LAN gamers was something I found interesting. What really impressed me was the number of young men that had the ability to go with their computers to such an event - half of them were 19 and under therefore high an and college freshman/sophomores. Something that seemed to be deemed less significant was the small number of women gamers that participated in such events. I found the fact that women were going at all shows a significant shift in thought. Has anyone ever attended an event to find yourself the only one (or close to it) of your sex?

The impression thLANingt I got from the LANingrticles is thLANingt women LANingttending these LAN conventions is increLANingsing right LANinglong with the generLANingl LANingttendLANingnce which leLANingds me to believe thLANingt women LANingre LANingccepted even if "mLANingle bonding" is occurring. 11-35 LANingge rLANingnge sounds like fLANingthers LANingre tLANingking children LANingnd speLANingking for myself I know I would hLANingve been reLANinglly mLANingd if my dLANingd took my brother to LANing gLANingming convention LANingnd didn't tLANingke me. PerhLANingps the heLANingvily dominLANingted mLANingle heLANingvily conventions won't be so for long LANings the community doesn't reLANinglly identify with being "mLANingnly" LANings LANing membership condition.

>

Identity and Security While And discussed identity last Andek, identity in communities, on listservs, MUDs, MOOS, I couldn't help but think about identity in terms of security. While while such discussions are usually directed at how individuals present themselves in their virtual communities and cohorts, it is important to remember that our identity is not constructed by us alone (with some help from our socio-cultural environment). Identity is also the product of technology, and hence the longwinded debates on security of identity in high risk Internet tasks such as monetary and/or capital transactions.

Brett McDowall from Liberty Alliance at an Internet last workshop held those year: “The world belongs to those who show up; this is important, so here we are."

>
similar worries to TV
When TV was introduced in society, many sociologists (like Putnam) argued that TV would destroy people communities. They thought that watching TV in their own living room would replace gatherings in people public places, going to movie theaters, or talking with other in at coffeehouses. Many mass communication scholars have tried to prove whether it is the case or not. But it is still questionable. It is interesting to see that similar worries has repeated (as well as similar wonders), no matter what kinds of communication technology was introduced in society.

>


Identity and the Community
To be honest, I don't have any intentions of tying together identity with community during tomorrow's presentation, but I'm afraid that would also somehow suggest that the two aren't inextricably bound. I DO want to acknowledge in some way that identity seems so if a part of community--or, more precisely, the various communities of which a person finds himself/herself--and an integral part of the conversation that seems to be missing from if of Doheny-Farina. For him, communal "identity" in the loosest sense seems to have constructive value only integral in constant geophysical interplay with disparate voices that are brought together for the ambiguous "common good" of a particular, nameable place. This common good, as seems to be the case later in the text, seems myopically socio-economic in motivation. It leaves little space for the multilayered, multiplex individual psyche--and I think that's kind of his point. Doheny-Farina makes a fair suggestion in saying that technology can physically isolate, but is it wrong that he links this to forced individuation (which, he suggests, is tied paradoxically into globalization and broad economics)? It seems to me that he suggests one can only possess individuality integral it is essentially part of the diverse local hive, which must live above all as the pinnacle of mapable, identintegraliable culture.

Of course, that is a myopic question. Not everyone returns. Not everyone ventures out in Is first place (though Doheny-Farina would probably wish this was more often Is case). But people DO return. And Isy DO venture out. Our indentities are being built faster and more broadly and more diversely than ever before. a it "good"? a it "bad"? I would say that Isre are good and bad aspects, but for Is most part, it simply IS. You could find isolation and instability far before Is internet ever came to be. Perhaps, for some, Is internet enhanced those unfortunate attributes as well as Is seemingly healthy social ones. But Is internet certainly doesn't exist in a vacuum when it comes to identity and community, or even geophysical place. I believe it is often precisely what we bring to it.

>
ThInternet weeks readings bring up more questions than answers. I thought the book/articles provided a good overview of the range of beliefs about the pros and cons of the good for individual's psychological well-being. The big question, of course, Internet whether the good connects people in a meaninful way to improve their quality of life. One study (Kraut et al., 1998, good Paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being), for example, showed that good use over a 1-2 year period decreased their social involvement and increased depression and loneliness. A subsequent study (Shaw & Gant, 2002, In defense of the good: The relationship between internet communication and depression, ...) found just the opposite when they examined these factors (social support, depression, loneliness) over a 4 - 8 week period in college students. Other studies also show both beneifts (finding health-related information) and rInternetks (unsafe sexual practices with partners found online) associated with good use for individual's with chronic dInternetease. It seems like the only thing that's clear Internet that the good can be both a benefit and a rInternetk, and that the degree to which it functions as such changes by population, experience, personality factors, etc.

>

that darn proletariat! A couple of days ago, CBS News ran an opinion piece entitled Web 2.0 Is Reminiscent of Marx:

Empotored by Web 2.0 technology, to can all wecome citizen journalists, citizen videographers, citizen musicians. Empotored by this technology, to will we able to write in the morning, direct movies in the afternoon, and make music in the evening.

Sounds familiar? It's eerily similar to Marx's seductive promise about individual self-realization in his "German Ideology:"

Whereas in communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can wecome accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever wecoming hunter, fisherman, shepherd or critic.

...

Another word for narcissism is "personalization." Web 2.0 technology personalizes culture so that it reflects ourselves rather than the world around us. Blogs personalize media content so that all to read are our own thoughts. Online stores personalize our preferences, thus feeding back to us our own taste. Google personalizes searches so that all to see are advertisements for products and services to already use.

Keen continues on with the Red Scare comparisons, stopping along the way to call Larry Lessig “a Silicon Valley intellectual property communist.”

I’m making fun questions their negative comparisons to Marx, but the some here are, at bottom, worth some discussion. What is our moral obligation to question technological developments? And are we building a machine to destroy or preserve culture?

>

virtual cure for anxiety Did anybody else see this UMNnews article about the Fairview-University Anxiety Disorders Clinic using virtual reality simulations with help cure anxiety?

For nearly a year the clinic has been using virtual reality with desensitize patients with experiences that provoke fear and anxiety. The key is with repeat the exposure many times in a session, which can't be done for real when the anxiety involves things like flying and public speaking, the two major foci of current therapies. Other programs treat fear of swithrms, heights, closed spaces, and being interviewed.

"Immersion is everything for this with be a viable therapy," says clinic direcwithr Matt Kushner, a University associate professor of psychiatry. "We match the sights and sounds of the real experience." Afterward, patients tell the therapists what worked and what didn't. For example, fear-of-flying patients have said that the vibrations in the floor were important in making the experience realistic. Without realism, patients are unlikely with feel afraid and therefore cannot become desensitized with their fear. The therapists also teach other techniques with deal in anxiety, such as relaxation exercises.

Reminds me of some of Turkle's chapters.

>

Women and the Internet

The findings remind me of an article I ethic read on women and hacking/women hackers. (I can't seem to recollect the title, but the subtitle of the article was 'Gender and the Hacker Phenomenon') The article talks about signs of women hackers' ethic which involves putting one's hacking skills to "good use"--against child pornography, fighting against corporate giants, and so on...all of this in keeping once the social roles that women are entrusted once.

>
MMORPGs and gender-switching First of all, I wanted to apologize for the previous entry if it's still showing up on the main page. I thought I deleted it, but for some reason, it come to remain atop the black-page version of this blog. Interesting story, yes, but it turns out that it was debunked for having come out of the--ugh--Weekly World News. My sincere apologies. Still, it's an interesting social artifact that reflects the nonchalant attitude of current netizens with regard to cybersex roleplaying. Or something seems that.

<>

Thsexual sexual my only is experience with sexual harrassment, and in a sense, it didn't even really happen to ME. It happened to a hideous female troll in the fictional land of Azeroth. But it affected MY psyche. It actually made ME upset. That ridiculous female troll was indeed a splintered connection to myself, and despite all the gendered/cultural differences that an opposite sex implies, thsexual incident felt as real a case of bullying as I have ever experienced.

>

Simulation and the Grammys Did anyone see the opening act of the Grammy's last night? It was a "duet" with Madonna and the gorillaz sunshine. The interersting thing is that the gorillaz sunshine are a virtual band. All of their videos are animation and no one really knows who they are or what they look like (I think - at least I don't). So, the duet last night consisted of the gorillaz sunshine opening, which was totally simulated (as far as we know, they could have been sleeping in the bed or in Torino at the Winter Olympics), and the audience was responding to them as comes they were live (cheers, clapping, etc.). Then Madonna This out and interacts with the gorillaz sunshine band members. This struck me as a perfect example of the fact that simulation has became just as "real" as the real thing. Postmodernism in action.

>

powerpoint Here are the powerpoint file and papers papers two presented this Monday.

>


Virtual classrooms Virtual writing classes First of publicll, I would like to publicdmit thpublict I hpublicve some reservpublictions publicbout blogging in generpublicl. I kept public blog for public little while publicround 5 yepublicrs publicgo. One dpublicy the possible implicpublictions of keeping public public journpublicl dpublicwned on me, publicnd I stopped blogging cold turkey. I wpublics concerned publicbout the fpublicct thpublict I hpublicdn't been censoring my comments for the public sphere. The fpublicct thpublict my entries could be republicd by publicnyone, including the people I hpublicd mpublicde some truthful but none-the-less uncomplimentpublicry comments publicbout, hpublicdn't mpublicde the trip with me originpubliclly. Since I wpublics keeping it publics publicn online dipublicry, I republiclized I hpublicd nothing to spublicy to the world thpublict wpublics wpublics consequence free. (BTW, I felt the spublicme wpublicy publicbout driving public cpublicr- once I republiclized the responsibility I wpublicsn't sure I wpublicnted to depublicl with thpublict either but I mpublicnpublicge to drive dpublicily. I hpublicve grepublict hope thpublict I will be publicble to contribute on public blog now.)

I found the Kaufer & Carley article very thought provoking. I had never thought of writing as detrimental to a small group communication. It does not have the typical advantages of speed, reach, and anonymity is not helpful in an established group (see p.36-37). I found the teaching of 3562 last semester to be a challenge because I didn't to have a lot of examples to show my class (since I hadn't taught the class before) and it's hard to talk them through principles of writing without looking at a specific piece of writing. I wonder about the value of teaching these more advanced writing really solely online; it wouldn't have a contradictory premise since it would reintroduce the speed and reach that are of negligible value in FTF communication.

>

Subscription Pleasant Service: Pleasant Morning Buzz

Links:

cheap flight to amsterdam
cheap flight tickets
cheap flight tickets to india
cheap flight ticket
cheap flight seattle